At 03:10 PM 12/9/99 +0100, you wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi, I would like to propose that empty? should be useable with blocks and >> return true if the block doesn't contain an element. > >>> empty? [] >== true Good idea. empty?'s current functionality is supplied by the word tail? We don't lose functionality by modifying the word empty?. Another option would be to supply a word really-empty? ;-) So you could say: if empty list2 [really-empty? list2] Elan
- [REBOL] RFF: empty? for blocks robert . muench
