At 03:10 PM 12/9/99 +0100, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi, I would like to propose that empty? should be useable with blocks and
>> return true if the block doesn't contain an element.
>
>>> empty? []
>== true

Good idea. empty?'s current functionality is supplied by the word tail? We
don't lose functionality by modifying the word empty?.

Another option would be to supply a word really-empty? ;-)

So you could say:

if empty list2 [really-empty? list2]

Elan

Reply via email to