Hi News,
you wrote:
>It's important to note that the (defective) behaviour is consistent
>regardless of whether you start by CLEARing LIST2 or LIST1 or any other
>pointer to the same (unnamed) series. So, it's not an exception, it's a
>bug (that proves the rule).
I'm not sure how you mean this consistency. If I reverse the example,
clearing list2 instead of list, I get the correct behavior:
>> list: [1 2 3 4]
== [1 2 3 4]
>> list2: next list
== [2 3 4]
>> clear list2
== []
>> list2
== []
>> list
== [1]
Elan
