Hi Joel, you quoted me: >> The line in which 'b was created wasn't changed. Most dramatically, it >> continues to be the exact same line you commented on as >> >> >the creation of B >> >is "dynamic" as opposed to A, where the creation is "static" >> > ... >> Let me see an explanation that maintains that >> >> >the notions of "global" vs. "local" are misleading in this case. >> >> as you claim, while it manages to explain away the fact that while >> a and b continue to be created in the exact same way the were before... >> and wrote: > >OK. I'll have a go at it. Very cool! I'm going to spend some quality time reviewing your response and get back to you on that on Monday. For now, have a happy, restful and peaceful holiday. And everyone else as well. Elan
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(7) lmecir
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(8) icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10... rryost
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(11... lmecir
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(12... icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(13... lmecir
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(12... rryost
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10... lmecir
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(7) joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(8) icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10... icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(9) joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(10... icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(11... joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(12... icimjs
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(13... joel . neely
- [REBOL] "logical" value referencing ... Re:(11... joel . neely
