[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
>
> On 27-Dic-99, you wrote:
>
> P> [thru "s" "om" skip " " "t" thru "t" " " "to" " " "p" skip
> P> skip "se"]
>
> What about:
>
> [thru "som" skip " t" thru " to p" 2 skip "se"]
Well, it doesn't solve my situation actually. The search string user
enters can be something like "s?me", and you have to scan for the "s"
occurance, followed by the rest of the rule - skip "me" " " etc.... The
buil-rule function seems to work, seems to translate ? and * into right
(almost, need to think about t*t case :-) sequences. The problem is
really skip to "right" occurance of "s", to match the rule. I am now
thinking about using some "ordinary" iteration, which should use 'find,
to find "s", and then will try to apply the rule. I know the solution
with rule | skip was also suggested here, but I think it will slow
things a little bit ....
Anyway, thanks for the help ...
-pekr-
> It shouldn't be a problem to build that.
>
> Regards,
> Gabriele.
> --
> o--------------------) .-^-. (----------------------------------o
> | Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila |
> | GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ |
> o--------------------) `-v-' (----------------------------------o
