Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 01-Gen-00, you wrote:
l> actually, I have only described a different model of
l> evaluation, not the one used in Rebol.
Oh, sorry then. :-)
l> You can't cause additional evaluation in Rebol by adding
l> parentheses.
Yup. And this is intuitive for me: (2 + 4) shouldn't be different
from 2 + 4.
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
o--------------------) .-^-. (----------------------------------o
| Gabriele Santilli / /_/_\_\ \ Amiga Group Italia --- L'Aquila |
| GIESSE on IRC \ \-\_/-/ / http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/ |
o--------------------) `-v-' (----------------------------------o
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/functions Re:(5) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(6) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(4) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(7) lmecir
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/functions Re:(7) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(9) lmecir
- [REBOL] Evaluation/parentheses Re: lmecir
- [REBOL] Evaluation/parentheses Re:(... joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation/parentheses Re:(... lmecir
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/parentheses ... giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(11... giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(11... lmecir
- [REBOL] Evaluation/words lmecir
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/words giesse
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/functions Re... giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/functions Re:(13... lmecir
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/functions Re... giesse
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation/functions Re:(3) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation/blocks Re: news . ted
