Hi folks,

>There are all sorts of ways to produce a value for 'e that will show
>the following behavior:
>
>    >> print e
>    e f
>    >> print e
>    e g
>    >> print e
>    e f
>    >> print e
>    e g

I'm really late with this, but this is an easy way to do it, and it shows yet
another use of modifying "literal" series.

>> e: ['e back reverse "fg"]
== ['e back reverse "fg"]
>> print e
e f
>> print e
e g
>> print e
e f

Cheers,
Eric

Reply via email to