Hi folks, >There are all sorts of ways to produce a value for 'e that will show >the following behavior: > > >> print e > e f > >> print e > e g > >> print e > e f > >> print e > e g I'm really late with this, but this is an easy way to do it, and it shows yet another use of modifying "literal" series. >> e: ['e back reverse "fg"] == ['e back reverse "fg"] >> print e e f >> print e e g >> print e e f Cheers, Eric
- [REBOL] Yet another puzzle Re: Russ
- [REBOL] Yet another puzzle Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Yet another puzzle Re:(2) KGD03011
- [REBOL] Yet another puzzle Re:(2) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Yet another puzzle Re:(2) larry
