Definitely. (The mutable values are storage in a sense.)
8^)
> Thanks, Ladislav,
>
> I wasn't worried about the storage per se. I've just felt that
there's
> a gap in the REBOL meta-vocabulary, which makes it difficult to
> distinguish between the REBOL object called "value" and what
that
> object contains. You used the term "state" along the way, which
works
> for me.
>
> I'm not familar with the terms "mutable" and "immutable", which
I now
> take to be part of the compiler lexicon.
>
> Is the core idea that immutable values can be stored in 1 or
more
> locations, without side-effects, depending on whether you are
> optimizing for space or speed, but that mutable values can only
be
> stored once?
>
> -Ted.
>
>
>
>
