Hi, Updating them would be great. Perhaps they might become "standard" function libraries for REBOL. Having them be loaded by user.r would keep the REBOL/core from getting bigger. Grouping them into files by functionality makes sense to me. Regards, Bernie Schneider Systems Analyst CIBER, Inc. 303-224-4159 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 2:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Re: functions? > > Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On 04-Jan-00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Just a thought, is there any function/s from people's formerly > > favourite :-D languages, that are missing in REBOL? For example, > > there's the BASIC string functions (LEFT RIGHT MID) that Donald Dalley > > wrote about. Some time back there was a mention that REBOL didn't have > > LISP's CDR CAR functions, IIRC. > > > Is there any others? > > > And, perhaps as a challenge/contest, any one want to write functions in > > REBOL to do the equivalent? > > Under Rebol1.x, I wrote a "library" of approximately 100 string and > conversion functions. It was a pretty complete Rexx set plus some from > SAS. > I also had a "library" of math functions and another of date/time > functions. > > Is there any interest in me updating them? > > If so, would people prefer each function as a separate file? Each group as > a > single file? Each function separate or something like rx/substr where the > functions were functions defined within a block? > > Dick > > -- > #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=# > *Dick Whiting* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _http://www.europa.com/~dwhiting/_ > /Satyre/ on Undernet #AmigaCafe# > #-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=#
