[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > l>> word ; mutable (protect/unprotect/set ...) > > Actually, I prefer to think that those function modify the > context, not the word. Well, at least for 'set. > Hmmm. Interesting, but I can see your point. How about 'bind? Do you consider that as modifying the word itself (not its value)? -jn-
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(6) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(7) news . ted
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(8) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(8) lmecir
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(9) whip
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(10) lmecir
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(11) whip
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(9) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(11) whip
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(8) giesse
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(10) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(10) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(12) lmecir
- [REBOL] Re: Evaluation Re:(12) giesse
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(14) lmecir
- [REBOL] selma stirling
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(12) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Evaluation Re:(13) lmecir
- [REBOL] how to create a hidden or encrypted script? mbehar
- [REBOL] how to create a hidden or encrypted script? Re: Al . Bri
- [REBOL] how to create a hidden or encrypted script? Re:(... joel . neely
