[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>  l>>         word ; mutable (protect/unprotect/set ...)
> 
> Actually, I prefer to think that those function modify the
> context, not the word. Well, at least for 'set.
> 

Hmmm.  Interesting, but I can see your point.  How about 'bind?  Do
you consider that as modifying the word itself (not its value)?

-jn-

Reply via email to