but won't REBOL/Command solve all this?
> how do I shell-out or call other (commercial) applications
> in a Rebol cgi?
>
> possible solutions that I know of are:
>
> * if you have source to the app, you can write a file or port
> based interface to it.
> - commercial apps dont come with (much) source
> - embarrasing if that 'other' app is also Rebol
> and must be started with new command-line arguments.
>
> * write a separate 'glue' app that listens on a port
> or a named pipe for things to do.
> - may require some interlock to tell when cmd is done.
> + advantage is that a single app can run continuously
> handling all cgi-shellout requests this way.
> - NT has weak named pipes, stronger 'messaging'.
> + it may be an advantage to not have to wait for cmd to finish.
> with named pipes, sync point can be later or not at all.
> + glue app can guarantee commands are issued securely
> and always from some point in tree under ID you expect.
> + glue app can be (on unixes)
> rebol parse_from_pipe.r |tee shelloutlog | grep '^eval ' | sh -
> so that full power of rebol for parsing pipe is available
> but shellouts and logs can happen too.
> + glue app can be run chroot()ed to some corner of the fs
> where it cannot be used to subvert system. parse_from_pipe
> can filter/authenticate senders instead of counting on
> sh to do it. sets limits on what rogue or "open" cgi may do.
>
>
> other/better ways?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> {-----}
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>