but won't REBOL/Command solve all this?


> how do I shell-out or call other (commercial) applications
> in a Rebol cgi?
> 
> possible solutions that I know of are:
> 
> * if you have source to the app, you can write a file or port
>   based interface to it.
>   - commercial apps dont come with (much) source
>   - embarrasing if that 'other' app is also Rebol
>   and must be started with new command-line arguments.
> 
> * write a separate 'glue' app that listens on a port
>   or a named pipe for things to do.
>   - may require some interlock to tell when cmd is done.
>   + advantage is that a single app can run continuously
>     handling all cgi-shellout requests this way.
>   - NT has weak named pipes, stronger 'messaging'.
>   + it may be an advantage to not have to wait for cmd to finish.
>     with named pipes, sync point can be later or not at all.
>   + glue app can guarantee commands are issued securely
>     and always from some point in tree under ID you expect.
>   + glue app can be (on unixes)
>        rebol parse_from_pipe.r |tee shelloutlog | grep '^eval ' | sh - 
>     so that full power of rebol for parsing pipe is available
>     but shellouts and logs can happen too. 
>   + glue app can be run chroot()ed to some corner of the fs
>     where it cannot be used to subvert system. parse_from_pipe
>     can filter/authenticate senders instead of counting on
>     sh to do it. sets limits on what rogue or "open" cgi may do.
> 
> 
> other/better ways?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> {-----}
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to