[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >If you go from secure allow for instance to secure throw, now permission is > >required, since you are raising security level. Going back to secure allow > >will again require your explicit permission. > Hi Elan, > > Actually, you only get prompted for permission if you attempt to lower > security levels. Raising them is fine at any time! > > - jim > > VIEW! VIEW! VIEW! Coming _very_ soon, soon, soon!!!! I just hope you are not speaking in cosmic time terminology ;-) -pekr-
- [REBOL] [REBOL] Updating a file as a port tjohnson
- [REBOL] [REBOL] Updating a file as a port Re: icimjs
- [REBOL] [REBOL] Updating a file as a port Re:(2) jimg
- [REBOL] [REBOL]Update file as port/Security tjohnson
- [REBOL] [REBOL]Update file as port/Security ... icimjs
- [REBOL] [REBOL]Update file as port/Security ... tjohnson
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(3) icimjs
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(4) jimg
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(6) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(6) icimjs
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(6) joel . neely
- [REBOL] [REBOL]FTP Read/Write problems tjohnson
- [REBOL] [REBOL]FTP Read/Write problems Re: Al . Bri
- [REBOL] [REBOL]FTP Read/Write problems Conti... tjohnson
- [REBOL] [REBOL]FTP Read/Write problems Conti... Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Update file as port/Security Re:(5) icimjs
- [REBOL] The forthcoming REBOL/View Al . Bri
- [REBOL] The forthcoming REBOL/View Re: Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] The forthcoming REBOL/View Re:(2) Al . Bri
