[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My vote (were this a democracy) would be to have the implementors
> mainly working on REBOL/View, but reserving some of their time to
> support the documentation team, who would be heads-down on getting
> full-blown REBOL/Core documentation out the door -- including lots
> more explanations, rationale, and here's-what-we-had-in-mind kinds
> of stuff. Quite a number of examples of the need for fuller and
> deeper documentation have been discussed -- some at GREAT length --
> in this mailing list since I've been involved.
>
> -jn-
As a lurker and relative newcomer to Rebol, I STRONGLY AGREE with the
above vote.
I currently have 879 filed email messages in my Rebol folder, being
extended discussions of features/behaviour/workarounds that constitute
for me the missing documentation that would make learning Rebol a lot
easier.
There are some incredibly curious and patient people on this list who go
to great lengths to understand and explain Rebol behaviour, and the
quality of explanation/debate is always stimulating. Thank you all.
Regards,
--
Richard Laing
Vancouver, CANADA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.tripod.com/rlaing/index.htm
*********************************************************
"Much may be made of a Scotchman if he be caught young."
Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
*********************************************************
