I asked to be on the list and did not get the beta (just a message from the
server saying I'm not on the list and will have to wait two days).

<*sigh*> I believe this happened to at least one other person, too. Guess
the beta signup mechanism was not foolproof.

Ah, me.... and I'm snowed in here in North Carolina today. It woulda been a
GREAT day to play with /View.

<*sigh*>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [REBOL] I'm not on the list for /view?! (was: REBOL/View )
> Re:(14)
>
>
>
> What's going on?!  I'm not a member of the "first wave" beta testers?
>
> Is this my fault because I didn't want to me-to the "I wanna be a /view
> beta tester"?  Yes. Does it matter that I've been driving everyone I know
> crazy all week long, checking my email every two minutes and reloading
> www.rebol.com once every 30?   (i'd be interested to know if there was an
> impressive increase in hits, though.)  Probably not.
>
> Who do I have to bribe, beg, or humble myself to get /view before the
> "Broader beta distribution"?
>
>
> At 03:39 1/29/00 , you wrote:
> >He sure should be... everyone is on the list that asked for
> it... and even
> >more.
> >
> >-Carl
> >
> >At 1/29/00 06:20 AM -0500, you wrote:
> > >Andrew --
> > >
> > >What did you do?
> > >
> > >I tried to follow the instructions, and have been told I'm already on
> > >the list. Petr was told he wasn't?
> > >
> > >-T.
> > >
> > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
> > >
> > >On 1/29/2000 at 4:00 AM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > >>> Dice: [3 D 6]
> > >== [3 D 6]
> > >>> print parse Dice [set N integer! 'D set Type integer! (print ["N:"
> > >N"Type:" Type])]
> > >N: 3 Type: 6
> > >true
> > >
> > >At last, I can have my 3D6!
> > >
> > >Andrew Martin
> > >First to get View...
> > >ICQ: 26227169
> > >http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
> > >-><-
> > >
> > >
>
>
> www.geocities.com/comradedane
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> pager 209 653
> 9098
>
>

Reply via email to