Hi,
it isn't that bad. Have a look, please:
>> split-path2 http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/dfgdfg
== [http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/ dfgdfg]
>> type? second split-path2 http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/dfgdfg
== url!
Regards,
Ladislav
----- Puvodn� zpr�va -----
Od: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Komu: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Odesl�no: 27. �nora 2000 19:26
Predmet: [REBOL] Split-path correction Re:
>
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi,
> >
> > after having some problems with split-path, here is my
version:
> >
> > (Andrew, it may be nice to have it in your %patch.r)
>
> Not yet, Andrew !
>
> >
> > split-path: func [
> > {
> > Splits a file or URL. Returns a block containing path
and
> > target.
> >
>
> Not always. It has other bugs than the original.
> It breaks the splitting of URLs (I called your version
split-path2) :
> >> split-path http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/dfgdfg
> == [http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/ %dfgdfg]
> >> split-path2 http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/dfgdfg
> == [http://fgdfgdfg.Fgdfg/fgdfgdfg/ dfgdfg]
>
>
> > Overcomes some limitations of the Core split-path like
> > strange results for:
> >
> > split-path %file.r
> > split-path %dir/
> > split-path to file! ""
>
> The last expression can also be written like that :
> split-path %""
>
> >
> > Moreover, the identity:
> >
> > file = (append copy first r: split-path file
second r)
> >
> > is always preserved.
>
> Remember that you can have a look to the source of the original
split-path
> to improve it :
> source split-path
>
> Olivier.
>
>
>
>
>
