Hi Carl
Here is the header I got with your post "REB Site Updated":
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 27 17:03:32 2000
Received: by mail.ecotope.com from localhost
(router,SLMail V2.7); Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:03:32 -0800
Received: by mail.ecotope.com from brando.rebol.net
(199.4.95.216::mail daemon; unverified,SLMail V2.7); Sun, 27 Feb 2000
17:03:31 -0800
Received: from office.rebol.net (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.9])
by brando.rebol.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA19286;
Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:13:28 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:11:14 -0800
Subject: [ALLY] REB Site Updated
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-REBOL: 2.2.0.4.2 "The Internet Messaging Language (TM) WWW.REBOL.COM"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Precedence: bulk
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
X-SELMA: [ALLY] 6798
Hope this helps
Cheers
Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 1:48 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Testing REBOL/View Beta List Re:(3)
> This problem sounds very odd. We do not forward ALLY to LIST. Either it
> is a bug in our email handling, or it is a bug in your client filters.
>
> I have not seen this problem here. The original message did not appear on
my copy of the main REBOL list. I did not see any sign of the problem until
you posted your reply to the list. I see no such duplication of messages
(however, I do a lot of message filtering, so it is possible that the
duplicates were filtered out on my side).
>
> Does anyone else see this problem?
>
> -Carl
----snip-------
