Hello GabrieIe! n einer eMail vom 19.02.00 13:47:37 (MEZ) Mitteleurop�ische Zeit schreibt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On 18-Feb-00, you wrote: > > V> I did and got something similar to this, but was able to hack > V> it with going to global scope by "/probe" instead of "probe". > > Actually, it doesn't work, or at least it doesn't here. I just get > "hello" returned (just because it is the last value in the block); > indeed, /probe is a refinement, not a word, so it is not evaluated > as a word. > My mistake, overlooked "last command is return value". Found something with contexts and a word with a beginning "/". Thought, maybe "/" is something like root-dir in unix, tryed a bit and what i expected was printed. No error-messages! I thought i was clever :) Thanks for the correction. Trust it now :o) - Maybe unused blocks and that should give a warning, optional? They are pretty to obfuscate code. Is there another reason for them (except return-value) ? Specially me is able to edit in outcomments and wondering why nothing happens a while :-) Gruss Volker
