[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject : [REBOL] REBOL for DOS Re:
> >From : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date : Thu Apr 13 09:25:07 2000
> ----------
>
> >But on the other hand - it's also question of simplicity. We don't need
> >all that W95 underlying infrastructure to maintain to just use a REBOL.
> >That's the reason I think DOS still fits my needs. What other "simple"
> >OSes are left? Linux? Not all that easy. Upcoming Neutrino? Standalone
> >Amiga/Elate? Maybe DOS is ugly OS, but it is lightweight and boots fast.
> >Still not sure RT will reconsider REBOL DOS release though ...
>
> Have you tried BeOS?
> Powerful as Linux, GUI interface, et al.
> Take a test drive :-)
> <www.be.com> <free.be.com>
Well, it was not my intention to miss BeOS, as in real - I am going to give it
a try as I have some good references to it. Just waiting for new hw. However,
it's still gui system, occupying some XX MBs on your hd. I had some "pocket"
server appliances in mind :-)
> Also - just to be on the Rebol topic.
> I'm playing with Rebol in the nntp area.
> I've tried a few test posts (cut and paste from the How-to, aamof) but my
> server keeps flinging them back - no subject. I managed to get one through,
> with no subject. Anything obvious I'm missing?
do you have Jeff's nntp.r? Never tried to post, though, sorry ...
-pekr-
