----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 6:57 AM
Subject: [REBOL] One function per class
> Michael Jelinek wrote (in refinements thread):
> > I really just want to separate the definition of the method
(function
> body) from the object, but I still want the method to be called
as part of
> the object. Some of these objects can be saved to a file and
reloaded, and I
> want the function "bound" to the latest definition in the
program, not what
> the definition was at the time that the object was saved. Also,
although I
> can't claim to "know" the internals of REBOL, I don't want
multiple copies
> (or worse, definitions) of the function floating around - it's
inefficient.
>
> This is the core of the problem. To have one function per
"class" of object,
> not one function per instance, for REBOL. This is easily done in
C++, not so
> easily in REBOL. I'm sure it can be done with some suitably
cunning script.
>
> I'll have to think about it more deeply, after I've done some
fiddling.
>
> Andrew Martin
> OO Rebol...
> ICQ: 26227169
> http://members.xoom.com/AndrewMartin/
> -><-
>
Hi,
the solution was presented here some time ago. Can repost it.
Regards
Ladislav
