[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >List!s are actually stored differently from blocks, paths and hashes, > >so any operation on them requires special code that has not been > >implemented for all action types. > > - jim > >Maybe the list also uses slightly less storage overhead per element? Lists use more storage per element than blocks. I would assume that hashes use more storage than blocks as well, but I don't know how they compare to lists. I think that parens use the same storage method as blocks. This is just in my experience, but I would be interested in to know if I'm right about this. Jim? Brian Hawley
