REBOLOVOSTI:
look at this:
>> random 16:25:00
== 9:58:19
>> random 16:25:00
== 5:01:20
>> random 9-Aug-2000
== 29-Jul-0334
>> random 9-Aug-2000
== 20-Nov-1733
>> random 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00
== 28-Nov-1919
>> random 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00
== 29-Oct-1756
>> random 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00+1:00
== 15-Jun-0060+1:00
>> random 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00+1:00
== 10-Aug-1710+1:00
it seems like bug.
another one:
>> y: copy [] repeat i 15 [append y 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00+1:00 + to-time i]
== [9-Aug-2000/16:25:01+1:00 9-Aug-2000/16:25:02+1:00 9-Aug-2000/16:25:03+1:00
9-Aug-2000/16:25:04+1:00 9-Aug-2000/16:25:05+1:00 9-...
;just to fill block with dates
>> find y 9-Aug-2000/16:25:02+1:00
== none
>> y
== [9-Aug-2000/15:25:01+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:02+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:03+1:00
9-Aug-2000/15:25:04+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:05+1:00 9-...
;looking for value equal to the second value from block -
;neither it's not found but all values has one hour subtracted!
>> y
== [9-Aug-2000/15:25:01+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:02+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:03+1:00
9-Aug-2000/15:25:04+1:00 9-Aug-2000/15:25:05+1:00 9-...
>> find y y/2
== none
>> y
== [9-Aug-2000/14:25:01+1:00 9-Aug-2000/14:25:02+1:00 9-Aug-2000/14:25:03+1:00
9-Aug-2000/14:25:04+1:00 9-Aug-2000/14:25:05+1:00 9-...
;this one is nicer - it cannot find EXACTLY THE SECOND value
;and again - one hour is missing
It does not happen when using following formats:
9-Aug-2000 9-Aug-2000/16:25:00 9-Aug-2000+1:00 (strange one generated by 'random).
What do you think about it?
Louci se
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Boleslav Brezovsky, NOT know as Kryptoplex, maybe on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
member of R.U.R (means RobotenUndRebol this week)
www.volny.cz/weirddream MUSIC&SOUND listen.to/sintezar
---------------------------------------------------------------
