Thanks, Larry!
You are right, of course!
That is great to know.
>===== Original Message From [EMAIL PROTECTED] =====
>Hi Galt
>
>You wrote:
>> Paths are a little weird, and so on...
>> You can't get to the parts of a path
>> as if it were a block.
>
>Actually you can:
>
>>> third 'a/b/c
>== c
>
>or if the path is referenced by a word
>
>>> p: 'a/b/c
>== a/b/c
>>> type? :p
>== path!
>>> third :p
>== c
>
>or if the path is in a block
>
>>> blk: ["string" a/b/c]
>== ["string" a/b/c]
>>> type? second blk
>== path!
>>> third second blk
>== c
>
>The trick is to prevent evaluation of the path in the same fashion as with
>functions. Also you can convert between paths and blocks.
>
>>> to-block :p
>== [a b c]
>>> to-path to-block :p
>== a/b/c
>
>HTH
>
>-Larry
