>- Open Your Mind -< Quoting from [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message (21-Aug-00 16:15:16). p> I dont think we need a range datatype. Ranges can be quite complex for p> different and complex values inviting more and more source manipulation for p> every new type of value. Besides it seems evident that REBOL is more than p> powerful enough will little code to get the results desired. Very true. But then again we don't need the url! datatype either. (-: Alessandro Pini ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (strike)
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(6) gschwarz
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(7) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(8) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(9) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(10... carlos
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(7) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(8) jpt
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(6) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(7) ptretter
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re... alex . pini
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(6) bhandley
- [REBOL] Re: Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(3) g . santilli
