Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Is there an alternative for:
>
> >>a: "101"
> >>foreach item a [print index? item]
> 1
> 2
> 3
>
> Obvious to you REBOL gurus this generates an error. But it illustrates
> clearly what I want to do. Damn, index? is native! :) Anyone have some
> helpful alternatives.
Ummm... I don't have clue what you are trying to do, but maybe
following will help:
while [not tail? a] [
print index? a
a: next a
]
Yours,
Jussi
--
Jussi Hagman CS in �bo Akademi University
Studentbyn 4 D 33 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20540 �bo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finland
