a: "101"
forall a [item: first a
    print index? a]

> 
>     Is there an alternative for:
> 
>     >>a: "101"
>     >>foreach item a [print index? item]
>     1
>     2
>     3
> 
> Obvious to you REBOL gurus this generates an error.  But it illustrates
> clearly what I want to do.  Damn, index? is native!  :)   Anyone have some
> helpful alternatives.
> 
> 
> Paul Tretter
> 
> 
Volker

Reply via email to