a: "101"
forall a [item: first a
print index? a]
>
> Is there an alternative for:
>
> >>a: "101"
> >>foreach item a [print index? item]
> 1
> 2
> 3
>
> Obvious to you REBOL gurus this generates an error. But it illustrates
> clearly what I want to do. Damn, index? is native! :) Anyone have some
> helpful alternatives.
>
>
> Paul Tretter
>
>
Volker
- [REBOL] Index? Re:(2) agem
- [REBOL] Index? Re:(2) rryost
