>- Open Your Mind -<
I've been examining the url-encode function from CookieClient.r, but there's something
I'd most definitely call a bug... if I could manage to pinpoint it! :-0
>> s: copy "" for c #"^(00)" #"^(fe)" 1 [append s c] append s #"^(ff)"
>> probe url-encode s
{%00%01%02%03%04%05%06%07%08%09%0A%0B%0C%0D%0E%0F%10%11%12%13%14%15%16%17%18%19%1A%1B%1C%1D%1E%1F%20%21%22%23%24%25%26%27%28%29*%2B%2C-.%2F0123456789%3A%3B%3C%3D%3E%3F@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ%5B%5C%5D%5E_%60abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz%7B%7C%7D%7E%7F%80%81%83
%8F%91%94%97%98%99%9A%9B%9F����%A4�%A6%A7%A8%A9%AA%AB%AC�%AE%AF%B0�����%B6%B7%B8�����%BE%BF%C0%C1%C2%C3%C4�%C6%C7%C8%C9%CA%CB%CC%CD%CE%CF%D0�%D2�%D4�%D6%D7��%DA�%DC�%DE%DF%E0%E1��%E4�%E6%E7�%E9��%EC�%EE%EF%F0%F1%F2%F3%F4%F5%F6%F7%F8%F9%FA%FB%FC%FD%FE%FF}
The result isn't correct (just look at all those unescaped characters beyond "%7F").
Now, don't ask me why, but, in different moments...
>> probe url-encode s
{%00%01%02%03%04%05%06%07%08%09%0A%0B%0C%0D%0E%0F%10%11%12%13%14%15%16%17%18%19%1A%1B%1C%1D%1E%1F%20%21%22%23%24%25%26%27%28%29*%2B%2C-.%2F0123456789%3A%3B%3C%3D%3E%3F@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ%5B%5C%5D%5E_%60abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz%7B%7C%7D%7E%7F%80
%8E%8F%90%91%92%93%94%95%96%97%9A%9B%9C%9E%9F%A0%A1�%A3%A4�%A6%A7�%A9�%AB%AC�%AE%AF%B0��%B3%B4�%B6%B7���%BB%BC�%BE%BF%C0%C1%C2�%C4�%C6%C7�%C9%CA�%CC�%CE%CF%D0�%D2�%D4�%D6%D7��%DA�%DC�%DE%DF%E0%E1��%E4�%E6%E7�%E9��%EC�%EE%EF%F0���%F4�%F6%F7%F8%F9%FA%FB%FC%FD%FE%FF}
>> probe url-encode s
{%00%01%02%03%04%05%06%07%08%09%0A%0B%0C%0D%0E%0F%10%11%12%13%14%15%16%17%18%19%1A%1B%1C%1D%1E%1F%20%21%22%23%24%25%26%27%28%29*%2B%2C-.%2F0123456789%3A%3B%3C%3D%3E%3F@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ%5B%5C%5D%5E_%60abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz%7B%7C%7D%7E%7F%80%81%83
%8F%91%94%97%98%99%9A%9B%9F����%A4�%A6%A7%A8%A9%AA%AB%AC�%AE%AF%B0�����%B6%B7%B8�����%BE%BF%C0%C1%C2%C3%C4�%C6%C7%C8%C9%CA%CB%CC%CD%CE%CF%D0%D1%D2%D3%D4%D5%D6%D7%D8%D9%DA%DB%DC%DD%DE%DF%E0%E1%E2%E3%E4%E5%E6%E7%E8%E9%EA%EB%EC%ED%EE%EF%F0%F1%F2%F3%F4%F5%F6%F7%F8%F9%FA%FB%FC%FD%FE%FF}
They're different. Playing around this thing in various ways, I got mixed results,
even correct ones :-). At times I seemed to catch a kind of pattern in the bug, but
lost it soon after. :-0
I've examined the source several times, but I can't find anything wrong in how it
works.
I think there's a bug in find and/or in bitsets, because one single time I had this:
>> for c #"^(00)" #"^(fe)" 1 [if find charset "ABC" c [prin c]] prin newline
ABC�
(notice the "squared" after the "C").
Tomorrow (after some sleep :-) I'm going to try harder, but in the meantime here's to
you antipodeans :-)
BTW, is there an *easy* way to get a string from a bitset? For example, to get
"123ABCabc" from charset "abcABC123".
Alessandro Pini ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"Dexteeeer!!! Get me out of here!!!" (Kimberly)
