Thanks I will look at that later on.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 3:05 PM
Subject: [REBOL] rebol weak points (i think) Re:(5)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ... Toolbook has very advanced OOP concepts and at the same time
> > much simpler and more elegant than other languages. But the only
> > thing that was really awful was that he coped with object directly
> > without dynamic linking to some sort of prototype or class or
> > whatever you want to call the ancestor. For building complex
> > program with such a model is very easy but to maintain and reuse
> > components in multiple projects all alive is very difficult
> > without creating our own framework of MFC like in Visual C.
> >
> > I have exactly the same problem in Visual Basic which only knows
> > Interfaces but completly ignore inheritance which is implemented
> > in Visual C. So if you want to make some sort of industrial
> > softwares (automate part of software conception) with the classic
> > document-view architecture in VB and Rational Rose you will have
> > tremendous difficulties.
> >
>
> You can use object composition, as in the following (hypothetical,
> built-by-hand) fragment of code.
>
> parent-object: make object! [
