I've just reported this same bug in REBOL/Core 2.3.0.3.1
the version for The Official Guide.
Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 2:03 PM
Subject: [REBOL] A bug in sorting on dates/times? Re:
> Hi Carl
>
> Yup, I get the same thing.
>
> REBOL/View 0.10.33.3.1 10-Sep-2000
> Copyright 2000 REBOL Technologies. All rights reserved.
> Type DEMO to run demo if it is disabled
> >> dates: [10-Sep-2000/18:24:13-5:00 10-Sep-2000/18:24:02-5:00]
> == [10-Sep-2000/18:24:13-5:00 10-Sep-2000/18:24:02-5:00]
> >> sort dates
> == [10-Sep-2000/23:24:02-5:00 10-Sep-2000/23:24:13-5:00]
> >> dates
> == [10-Sep-2000/23:24:02-5:00 10-Sep-2000/23:24:13-5:00]
> >>
> Also the same with latest experimental builds of Core and Command.
>
> -Larry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2000 2:54 AM
> Subject: [REBOL] A bug in sorting on dates/times?
>
>
> > I think I've found a bug in 'sort when it's sorting a block of dates.
> > (This is using the experimental Amiga version of REBOL/View
> > 0.10.31.1.1.)
> >
> > With two files saved as file1 and file2, this is what I get when I
> > enter the following...
> >
> > >> dates: []
> > == []
> > >> insert dates modified? %file1
> > == []
> > >> insert dates modified? %file2
> > == [10-Sep-2000/18:24:02-5:00]
> > >> dates
> > == [10-Sep-2000/18:24:13-5:00 10-Sep-2000/18:24:02-5:00]
> > >> sort dates
> > == [10-Sep-2000/23:24:02-5:00 10-Sep-2000/23:24:13-5:00]
> > >> dates
> > == [10-Sep-2000/23:24:02-5:00 10-Sep-2000/23:24:13-5:00]
> >
> > Those first times returned by the dates block are correct, but notice
> > how they've jumped from 18hrs... to 23hrs... after being sorted?
> > Sort shouldn't alter what it's sorting, right?
> >
> > I've submitted this to feedback, but do others get similar results?
> >
>
