Once upon a time [EMAIL PROTECTED] spoketh thus: <...> > > And... *g* There's one thing I've been missing all the time! > > Why are there no full names in the sender entry of the mail header??? > > You'll recall that before SELMA took over the list, there *were* full > names in the header. Ingo and I discussed the "problem" and even had > some solutions; none of mine ever got worked through enough to submit > to RT for inclusion in Selma (or REBOL itself). <...> Hi Kev, my version works for me and got sent to feedback (final version was #1467 22/Nov/1999, I think), after that I never heard about it. Same for help working on path values (#2729 12/Apr/2000). So I now just enjoy my working system, best regards, Ingo
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(10) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(10) lmecir
- [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(9) deadzaphod
- [REBOL] Rebol - The Official Guide Al . Bri
- [REBOL] Rebol - The Official Guide Re: jeff
- [REBOL] Rebol - The Official Guide Re:(2) Al . Bri
- [REBOL] mailing list since 1998 & full names... t_degrav
- [REBOL] mailing list since 1998 & full n... kevin
- [REBOL] mailing list since 1998 & f... ole_f
- [REBOL] Re: mailing list since 1998 &am... g . santilli
- [REBOL] Re: full names in sender ingo
- [REBOL] Re: full names in sender kevin
- [REBOL] full names in sender Re:(2) news . ted
- [REBOL] full names in sender Re:(2) mailinglists
- [REBOL] Rebol - The Official Guide Re: gchiu
