[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [some skip] >Of course, Carl's recent mention of the mysterious 'compile keyword >implies something like this is taking place behind the scenes (and >could then ultimately be exposed). I remember that message. There were smileys all over it. Carl was joking about a compile function. If you thought something like that mysteriously existed, I guess Carl's joke backfired. Oh well :( Brian Hawley
- [REBOL] jREBOL (was Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(9)) hopeless
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(10) handy
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(11) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(12) bciceron
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(12) gmassar
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(12) handy
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(13) news . ted
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(14) petr . krenzelok
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(13) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(14) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(7) brian . hawley
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(7) ptretter
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(6) jhagman
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(7) joel . neely
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(8) jhagman
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(9) holger
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(10) jhagman
- [REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:(3) news . ted
