[REBOL] Compiler for Rebol ? Re:

[chris . double]

> Those are VERY different.  And, IMHO, the first would be extremely
> difficult (if not totally infeasible), while the second would likely
> be too slow for any realistic use.

Have you seen Kawa? The scheme compiler that compiles to JVM and
executes the byte code on the fly [1].

It would seem to face the same sorts of problems as a REBOL-on-JVM
would face and it works quite nicely.

[1] http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/kawa.html

Chris.
--
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan