[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To sum up thus far, it appears that handling these three cases
>
> 1) same object, same method, computed argument(s)
> 2) same object, computed method, same argument(s)
> 3) computed object, same method, same argument(s)
>
> involves the use of three (radically!) different techniques. I'm
> very grateful for the responses thus far. I would be even happier
> if we could come up with a single general approach that would
> handle all three of these cases.
This is the best I can think of:
>> do-meth: func [obj [object!] meth [word! path! block!] args [block!]] [
[ do compose [(to-path compose [obj (to-block :meth)])
(args)]
[
]
>> do-meth obj 'f [1]
1 none none
>> do-meth obj 'f/ref [1 2]
1 true 2
>> do-meth obj compose [f (pick [ref []] random 2)] [1 2]
1 true 2
>> do-meth obj compose [f (pick [ref []] random 2)] [1 2]
1 none none
== 2
>> do-meth obj compose [f (pick [ref []] random 2)] [1 2]
1 none none
== 2
>> do-meth obj compose [f (pick [ref []] random 2)] [1 2]
1 none none
== 2
>> do-meth obj compose [f (pick [ref []] random 2)] [1 2]
1 true 2
Regards,
Gabriele.
--
Gabriele Santilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Amigan - REBOL programmer
Amiga Group Italia sez. L'Aquila -- http://www.amyresource.it/AGI/
