----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 10:13 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Antwort: Command question Re:(3)
> Maybe we could also agree upon some standard plug-ins system, as proposed
> by Andrew Martin on rebmail list, and then Elan's or other solution would
> be just one of plug-ins ...
>
> the idea:
> REBOL/
> /Plug-ins
> /Allen_K_cool_menu
> /other-menu
> /dbms
> /inactive
> Allen_K_cool_menu.cfg
> other-menu.cfg
> dbms.cfg
>
LOL! Looks like I'll have to make that menu a reality ;-)
> the activation/deactivation of plug-in would be decided upon presence of
> file in /plug-ins directory, and deactivation just means moving
> appropriate .cfg file into /inactive subdir ...
>
> plug-ins are scripts, probably should function as separate modules (once
> modules are introduced to rebol), should represent certain domain specific
> dialects, etc...
>
> So far Andrew calls plug-ins components, but it should change imho as
> rebol uses 'component name for /View, /Shell, /Library etc. components.
>
> ... all is opened yet - we don't have modules yet, we don't have final VID
> yet, and so I am just curious, if using 'stylize aproach will be powerfull
> enough to handle more complex gui areas (components, widgets), as menu is
> for e.g.
I think styles are powerful enough to do this, they are as powerful as any
other object in REBOL.
Cheers,
Allen K
ICQ 456820
PS. Hey Petr have you got ICQ, you could join Andrew and I on our daily
discussions :-)
