Hi, Changed the subject to make this a separate thread, as I like some opinions.
On Fri, 7 May 2021 at 06:45, Amir Sarabadani <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 13:17, Andre Koopal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Amir, >>> >>> Thanks indeed for the upgrade, something I also think that was highly >>> needed from a security perspective, so a good thing. >>> >>> One thing I did notice with my list being migrated is that we had some >>> lists of non-members being able to post and also some blocked users. I >>> don't find them back in the settings under message acceptance, but I find >>> them in the users section under non members. I find this a bit strange. >>> First of all you really need to go into the user itself before you see if >>> it is a user you allow as non-member, or that it is a user marked to >>> automatically discard. Secondly due to that when an account is created on >>> that e-mail, you see the lists you are a non-member of. You fortunately >>> can't see why you are a non-member, but it seems a small data-leak to me. >>> >> > The non-member option in mailman3 is a bit weird. I agree. Non-member can > also mean "accept emails from these address right away" so it's not > negative meaning all the time but as you said, I agree. > It can be positive or negative indeed, But it is still strange, that you can see that you are a non-member, in principle it is of no use, as you can't change anything on it, and I think these are settings for the the admins/moderators of the lists with no need for the users to see it. > >>> Will the old fields to filter users under settings/message acceptance >>> still work, or will those users automatically converted to non-members? As >>> an admin that will be difficult to manage, and it would be at least needed >>> to be able to filter on the set action so you can see what is what. Also I >>> don't think the interface should show you the lists you are a non-member of. >>> >> > Have you tried turning them back to the setting? I haven't tried it yet > and it might work. For the issues, you can file a bug in > phabricator/upstream. I personally don't see it as a big deal. > I quickly tried to put one e-mail address in the 'Accept these non-members' section, and it wasn't converted to a non-member so it seems the lists there work as well. Didn't completely test if it works but I assume it will, as otherwise there would be more complaints. Don't mind creating phabricator tickets but I would like to hear a bit more options, is it ok the old settings with lists with fields have been converted to non-members, or would it have been better to just have them in the lists in a text field only, where you have an overview. Any more opinions? I also would like a bit more input if others indeed think it is wrong that you can see the lists where you are non-member off. At least for the filter option, I already created T282325. Regards, André Koopal
_______________________________________________ Listadmins mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] By sending a message to this list, you email all admins of all lists. To request technical changes for a specific list, instead create a task in Phabricator. See https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists
