Very nice site!  I always love seeign people who are willing to take the extra steps to make a website that is truly foreveryone!

A few small things that I would like to point out,
- The page's XHTML does not validate - < http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fnewserver.emis-online.com%2F>
I'm not sure if its the script on your page throwing it off or if its just the validator acting up.
- I would suggest delivering complete, unstyled text for NN4 and WebTV Viewers.  (Forgive me, I test and run every browser that I can get on my machine, leaving out only mac-only browsers as my mac is not here with me).  NN4 can handle the text and flash even, but the CSS gets it everytime.  WebTV's not too bad, the skip to content link is very useful and text is all readable, but for whatever reason, the images at the bottom of the page (search, emis nug, etc) appear too tiny to read.
- Lynx picks up all the text, very nice & neat.
- IE5: The text (Privacy Policy, etc) overlaps the (?) image.

Ok... that's my two cents.  Again, very nicely done! :-)

--Zachary


On 4/10/06, Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone know of a standard, preferably copyright-free (or copyleft)
website accessibility statement that I could use for the Help >
Accessibility page of a website I'm doing? I've looked but found nothing
suitable.

The site, in case you want to have a look and try to break it is
http://newserver.emis-online.com. Any constructive criticisms will be
gladly accepted. EMIS are one of the UKs largest supplier of IT systems
to the NHS, and a major supplier to the Ministry of Defence, and I'm on
a one-man mission to make all their website standards compliant :0)

Many thanks

Chris
******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************




--
==================================================
"The best way to predict the future is to invent it."

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hopkinsprogramming.net

Reply via email to