> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Surely any conforming user agent should ignore any markup that it does > not understand, so is there really any need to stop using > name, where it > is being used for 'belt and braces' compatibility?
For XHTML 1.0 (even strict), using name is still fine. Deprecated, yes, but not invalid. For XHTML 1.1, though, it would be silly to aim for compatibility, as then the question would arise: if you're after compatibility, why move to 1.1? Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Web Editor / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk ________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ ________________________________ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
