Forgive me for my interference, however could not the
text used in the alt and title tags, itself be the deciding factor whether
or not it is applicable to the content?
The instance of use is subjective to reason of use.
If a icon (and these are) is used, it is most often used to call
attention to, as well as add visual appeal to the typed text. Not just
for decorative reasons.
From a beginners view point, and one who has sought out
the standard practices on this subject, I am easily distracted and confused
when the point of a subject is debated back and forth such as this.
In short I've come to the conclusion, that the bottom line
when it comes to alt vs. title, is the choice relies on the context
and content.
In this instance I would say both alt and title have a
place on the site that was presented, although I think, the text used leaves a
bit to be desired. lol, and I have provide for your enjoyment some
examples of alternatives. Or along those
lines................. <img src="" width="100"
height="89" alt="Wheel Chair Icon: Universal Icon Symbol of
Accessibility" title="The universal wheel chair iconic symbol that
indicates accessibility">
<img src="" alt="Magnifying Glass:
Universal Icon Symbol for Search" title="The universal
magnifying glass
iconic symbol that signifies search"/>
<img src="" alt="Human Head
Profile: Universal Icon Symbol for Mankind" title="The universal
profile representation of the human head, the iconic symbol
that indicates use by mankind" />
<img src="" alt="Certificate:
Universal Icon Symbol for Recognition, Achievement and or Completion"
title="The universal certificate iconic symbol that indicates special
recognition, achievement and or completion" />
****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ****************************************************** |