Hi Mike,

You wrote:

However, what I've noticed that you do not see are articles pushing
the screen reader manufacturers to make more capable and intellegent
readers for the browsers.....they seem to be able to do this for
desktop applications (at least to a reasonable level).  It seems that
many of the efforts we are making (as well as the WSG) to enable
accessibility are in fact disabling (and in many cases abandoning) the
rich features on the net - this goes back to the whole "magazine
article" site versus the "application" site - two different purposes,
two different needs - both based on the same underlying technologies,
and both need to be accessible.

IMO this is because physical access rules came after there were
wheelchairs that had, in turn, been developed long after most of
the physical structures we take for granted were standardized.

In spite of that timeline, there were some things that had to be
changed such as the provision of ramps.

In web development, we are, then, figuratively, trying to build
doorways and invent the wheelchair at much the same time. Not
only is there a major emphasis on web sites doing a lot of the
work on this but also our efforts may be obsolete as soon as the
next generation of assisting software is introduced.

That may be a discouraging prospect, but I think we still have
to keep up as best as we can.

--

Regards,

Gene Falck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to