> So I use PascalCase for classes and camelCase for ID's. What's the benefits of using PascalCase for classes? It's not as if you don't know which is which, "id=" and "class=" are pretty apparent.
I'd say camelCase for sure. But I have been brought up on C, C++, Java, and I still insist on it in C#. - A ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Laugesen Sent: Wednesday, 14 June 2006 3:56 p.m. To: [email protected] LOL hahah I stand corrected, thanks Kevin =8-) PS For a bit of a giggle; when I first read your reply I thought "mmmm, no no, I'm sure it's CamelCase, I'll just fire up wikipedia and chec... oh yes, Wiki... WikiWiki... PascalCase... bugga". On 14/06/06, Kevin Futter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 14/6/06 1:01 PM, "James Laugesen" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I use CamelCase or "propper case" for CSS classes; just a habbit (standard?) from OO programming; where classes (should) always be named using CamelCase. And I use lower-case first letter + upper case for ID's, as they are unique for 1 HTML element only, they (IMO) represent a "variable", so again, I follow my OO habbits (standards?) of lowerCaseFirstLetter. Actually, "lowerCaseFirstLetter" is camelCase (not CamelCase - ever see a camel with a hump on its arse?). -- Kevin Futter Webmaster, St. Bernard's College http://www.sbc.melb.catholic.edu.au/ ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
