Correct me if I am wrong, but 'Accessibility Statements' seem to be trying to do two different things a lot of the time: 1. Listing the standards and accreditations that have been attained. 2. Explaining to the user how to use their own browser
The first point is little more than a nod to the Lawyers in an attempt to say 'We did our best' The second is doomed to failure by the march of progress, and the fact that those that write them generally only access the site with IE on a PC. Am I alone in thinking that deciding which version you are trying to write, and sorting out the inherent issues is more important than tweaking a word here and there? Mike ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************
