RE: [WSG] cursor: default; or something else

[Taco Fleur]

Thanks! Not sure how you figured out what I was after, after reading my own cryptic email I would not have made sense out of it ;-) Yes, I think default out of the available is best to, I was thinking about the WAIT cursor, because when hovering over the null item we are really waiting for them to make a selection. Although that one did not feel right....   Kind regards, Taco Fleur free call 1800 032 982 or mobile 0421 851 786 — fax 07 3414 6464, international +61 7 3325 5103 www.pacificfox.com.au an industry leader with commercial experience since 1994 … our services: online, print, marketing & information technology website, branding, logo, business cards, letterheads accept online credit card payments www.commerceengine.com.au domain registrations, .com for as low as fifteen dollars a year, .com.au for fifty dollars two years!   From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cole Kuryakin Sent: Monday, 10 July 2006 4:38 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] cursor: default; or something else Taco –   For what it’s worth, I always use the “default” cursor (arrow) on my nav hrefs that are nulled (“#”) on a landing page. IMO it’s much better indication that the hover is not clickable.   Cole   ****************************************************** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints on posting to the list & getting help ******************************************************