Bruce Morrison wrote:
For those who don't read slashdot

http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/07/20/1242210.shtml

        "Google today released Accessible Search, a Google Labs product
        aiming to rank higher pages which are optimized for blind users.
        Google asks you to adhere to the W3C's Web Content Accessibility
        Guidelines if you want to make sure your pages are accessible
        (and thus, rank better on Google Accessible Search). I wrote a
        small tool to compare results of default and accessible
        results."
I wonder if and how long it will take for this to move to the standard
search.

Cheers
Bruce


I entered a search term in and tested the results: those complying to the WAI are not necessarily ranked higher. I assume there is also some other mechanism weighing in here, that perhaps can over-ride the accessibility features?

Also, some accessibility features in a website would be present while others wouldn't. Are some accessibility features ranked higher in importance than others? And if so, how has that decision come about? Are some not considered relevant at all?

I think we need to know more :)

Kat



******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to