another low-tech "expert" who blames technology instead of getting educated.
i have nothing else to say then- if you don't know the material, at least don't shout it or "blog" it or show it to the intire world to watch!
stay in table-structure and full attributed code, man.
On 7/23/06, russ - maxdesign <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
May not be answering your question, but relevant to the overall point...
There have been a number of responses to this "interesting" blog post by
Dvorak including:
<http://westciv.typepad.com/dog_or_higher/>
<http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16531828 >
<http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/lost_any_css_lately.html>
< http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/too_many_cooks_dvorak_special.ht
ml>
<http://www.stuffandnonsense.co.uk/archives/way_too_many_cooks_dvorak_specia
l.html>
Thanks
Russ
>> From Links for Light Reading, July 19:
> Why CSS Bugs Me
> <http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,1987181,00.asp >
>
> I just realized that Dvorak's entire rant about CSS cascading rules
> might just be another example of a tech expert talking nonsense
> regarding an area he knows nothing about.
>
> body>div { this does not cascade; }
>
> Just another case of CSS getting the blame for something IE doesn't
> support, am I right?
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
--
visit my blog: http://www.webcssdesign.34sp.com/
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
