With that particular page, and with the example you used, then I'd say yes, a tabular layout is well justified. In fact I wouldn't even recommend structuring data in that fashion using divs/spans etc, as the markup would a) be as bulky as hell, and b) provide no relationship between the headings and data, or even the data itself.

Tables are the way to go for this kind of use.

I hope that helps for future reference.

Thanks,

David

tee g. peng wrote:
On Aug 6, 2006, at 4:10 AM, Ben Buchanan wrote:
Hi I have a question, should ebay listing alike  be tabular layout?

Do you mean an entire item's listing, or a page listing multiple
items? A URL would be handy to clarify which bit of ebay you're
talking about :)


Something like this:
http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?cgiurl=http%3A%2F% 2Fcgi.ebay.com%2Fws%2F&fkr=1&from=R8&satitle=designing+with+web +standards&category0=

The layout I need to do is such:

image | item desc | Price | Ending | Time Left | Bids | Store


Didn't get a response early so I told client he shouldn't waste money for me to do the conversion, still, I would love to have second opinion perhaps for future reference.

By the way, the layout of the site is CSS but few section are done in tables, that is part of the reason I think the listing shouldn't need to convert to CSS. It looks tabular to me.

Best,

tee



******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

 See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
 for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************




__________ NOD32 1.1694 (20060805) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





******************************************************
The discussion list for  http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to