Germ, that’s exactly what I was saying.

Samuel, lightbox uses over 100k of _javascript_ – that’s pretty big for dial-up.

Litebox is a much smaller option though.

 

In general though, I find the popups=evil argument a bit flawed. Take as an example a page which has a list of 25 cars for sale.

It makes sense not to have to load all images just so you don’t have popups because most users will not want to look at all 25, or wait/pay for the download of them.

 

Grant

 


From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samuel Richardson

 

Big is relative though, Lightbox is around 60 – 70k of _javascript_ I think. That would be about the size of one of the images it was displaying, and once it’s loaded it’s cached.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Germ

 

If it takes forever to load then that is what is wrong with it....
A lot of people still use dail up and I am one of them :(

On 8/15/06, Focas, Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



What's wrong with lightbox?
http://www.huddletogether.com/projects/lightbox2/

It looks great but it takes for ever to load unless you have broadband
because it requires huge .js files.

**********************************************************************
This message is intended for the addressee named and may contain
privileged information or confidential information or both. If you
are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify the sender.
**********************************************************************

******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************
******************************************************
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/

See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
******************************************************

Reply via email to