Tony Crockford wrote:
Hmmm...
I think we could take this too far.
if html contains head and body, why cant body contain header, content
and footer
yes they are positional.
but there has to be some structural semantics as well surely? (we
accept that head comes before body...)
we also accept thead tbody and tfoot, for tables and they have rules
as to what follows what.
maybe we should be pressing for page subdivision as a standard, rather
than trying to make up new names for what goes at the top, middle and
bottom of the page...
;o)
I agree. The thing is, if top, middle and bottom are OK, surely left and
right are too? Where do you draw the line?
(my own view is that they probably are OK - like Patrick said,
pragmatism is the order of the day here, surely?)
--
Best Regards,
Bob McClelland
Cornwall (UK)
www.gwelanmor-internet.co.uk
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
