Ok... sorry!
I should have read all the posts... there was a reply...
*blush*... :]
M.

Melissa Cooper wrote:
Hello... only just weighing into the chat and I haven't read all of the posts, but I'm a little disturbed that you haven't been responded to Kepler... so I'll step up and continue a moral debate. (or is that not ok, because standards aren't about morals)

This stuff on a commercial level usually comes down to project budgets and I think only legal presidents will force clients to be prepared to pay higher prices for their websites to ensure that they comply. Isn't this more work for us and a bigger slice of the project budget pie??
Isn't it an opportunity?
Web development professionalism should be more than W3C standards and search engine optimization. I think that promoting ourselves as premium services should include accessibility compliance. Isn't it only a matter of time before accessibility as a specialisation sky rockets in demand? Am I just giving away good idea's again?

I'll admit right up that I'm not prepared and fully trained up on accessibility issues, but I think the issue is more important than my professional insecurities and I'll keep it on my must do list. Won't all happen over night - but it will happen eventually. And that is a good thing. Certainly the net generation will be more appreciative when their living longer bodies start to age.
:]
Melissa.

John 'Max' Maxwell wrote:
Kepler Gelotte wrote:
Max aka The Pig Farmer - fighting for the spiral stair case ...

Being a wheelchair user myself, I find your statements to be offensive at a
personal level and misguided at a professional level.
I don't think adding alternate ways of navigating a web site will encroach on your art. If you feel you can't add the appropriate WCAG modifications to your site without stifling your creativity, why not add an alternate link to
accessible (artistically ugly) pages?
Hopefully we learned from the Jim Crow laws that we can't segregate an
entire segment of the population and call ourselves a "Democratic Society".
Regards,
Kepler Gelotte (one of the 'peasants')


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************


excellent - there's always one - and thank you for identifying yourself. You clearly exposed me as an individual who actually is fighting for spiral staircases and disrespects all forms of democracy, no no - it wasn't a joke - you're quite justified don't worry - I can only help that my platform provided you with a satisfactory position from where to correct me.

Misguided? I'll take my chances there - to be honest - going to war in Iraq with a 50 year old weapon was misguided, but I survived that. But offensive? If you can honestly tell me that you as an individual were offended by my humour then I can only wholeheartedly apologise as it is something I do not take any pleasure in and until tonight had managed to avoid.

All of my websites these days are valid, clearly constructed and encourage access by all members of society using all variations of hardware and software.

Regards.

*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************



*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************







*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to