what a crappy lookn site i must say who would be stupid enough to steal this.

you ask off topic questions I give real honest answers.

On 9/8/06, Matthew Pennell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/7/06, Andreas Boehmer [Addictive Media]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just followed that link from the google results to google's cached page.
> Doesn't look to me as if they are duplicating your page but rather linking
> to it and telling people what your site is about.
>
> Don't know about you, but I'm always happy about free cross links.

Seconded - that site wasn't ripping any content, it's a site directory
providing links and descriptions to other sites (and googlejuice too).

Way to over-react - are you going to sue Google too for 'republishing'
your content?!


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************




--
PRIVILEGED - PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the
use of the addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential
or privileged. If you receive this email and you are not the addressee(s)
[or responsible for delivery of the email to the addressee(s)], please
disregard the contents of the email, delete the email and notify the
author immediately.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to