|
Yellow all, I was wondering about the Atom status. From the W3C Feed Validator, I read : http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-07-15-a.html In the case of a new website, is it worth creating both RSS2 and Atom 0.3 for example ? I told my colleague RSS2 is enough and standard but he has just released an online atom version (unclean) and told me I couldn't dispute Atom is a standard. To my mind, maybe the latest draft but not the latest recommendation. What do you think about ? I apologize if you already argue about this subject. I subscribed the list in August 2006 and I didn't find such topics. Cheers, _________________________________________________ ![]() Pierre-Henri Lavigne Cell Phone: +33618753267 http://www.getphuture.com Some exist through what they do... We exist through what we are ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* |
- [WSG] RSS Feed: Undead Atom Feed Pierre-Henri Lavigne
- Re: [WSG] RSS Feed: Undead Atom Feed Andrew Krespanis

