Sorry Steve, I wasn't intentionally referring your point, I was just
dismissing any general idea that it was bad design visual design. I
need to be more discriminatory with my use of quotation marks next time.
Nick
Just by way of clarification, when I said "it _looks_ bad" I wasn't
referring to the visual aspect of the design, but rather the
execution.
Cheers
Steve
On 06/10/06, Nick Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I wouldn't even say it "looks bad" as visually it's much better
than a lot of sites (aside from little things like overly faint and/
or small text). With that in mind the only way to really say it is
bad design is if it is inappropriate to it's requirements... which we
don't know.
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
