Actually, my bad, I thought you were talking about absolutely positioned elements, I mis-read the "relative" at the start of your sentence :(
Samuel -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Faulds Sent: Monday, 16 October 2006 11:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WSG] Relative positioning and Netscape 6 Relative positioning is not a very reliable cross browser method for getting elements where you want them. You're better off using an element's margins for most positioning and in some cases floats (e.g. float: left/right). On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:35:58 +1000, Andrew Ivin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to find out what Netscape 6's capabilities are as far as > relative positioning goes. > I have a page where I have a parent div, absolutly positioned, with > two relatively positioned child block level elemnets; one positioned > to the top left, the other top right. > > The top right absolutely positioned element is ignoring the relative > container in NS 6, and is positioning relative to the viewport - top > right of browser window. > > Could this be NS 6's lack of support of positioning? > -- Tyssen Design Web & print design services www.tyssendesign.com.au Ph: (07) 3300 3303 Mb: 0405 678 590 ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ******************************************************************* ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
